If your product uses AI to generate content, whether that’s text, images, code, or something else, ownership is not always as simple as “we built it, we own it.”

Under current copyright law, purely AI-generated output, with no meaningful human creative input, generally is not eligible for copyright protection. Courts and the Copyright Office have continued to hold the line on this human authorship requirement through 2026, including a recent case where the U.S. Supreme Court declined to revisit the question. Where a human meaningfully shapes, selects, or edits AI-assisted output, the human’s contribution can still be protectable, even if the underlying generation involved AI.

For most companies, the more immediate ownership questions are contractual, not constitutional. What do your AI vendor’s terms of service actually say about who owns the output? Does your agreement with a customer or contractor address AI-generated work product at all? If multiple tools touch a single deliverable, who owns the result?

These are solvable problems, but only if they are addressed before a dispute forces the question. If AI is part of how your product gets built, it is worth a conversation about where your ownership position actually stands.

Have a question about this?

Let's talk about
your specific situation.

Schedule a Consultation →